Without meaning to sound too much like Mickey Kaus, it's remarkable that the New York Times' Adam Nagourney can write an entire article on the dynamics of being a presidential primary campaign frontrunner without mentioning the actual policy positions, let alone the tactics, of the mentioned candidates.
Thus what we get instead is a It's Good to be the Frontrunner, Except When It's Not analysis, which has nothing to say about its supposed hook to the current race in the difficulties of John McCain -- those being hard to discuss without mentioning his uneasy relationship to George W. Bush, his base, and the spectacle this presents to the wider public: someone more in favour of Bush's project in Iraq than Bush himself is, but who always pulls back from a decisive rupture from Bush when the opportunity presents. That's more complicated than just having once been the presumptive winner of the race.
No comments:
Post a Comment