Tuesday, March 06, 2007

One missing link

With the Scooter Libby trial having revealed, inter alia, that the White House thought that excessive scrutiny of the uranium-from-Niger claim was a threat, isn't it time for the British government to state what, exactly, is their supporting evidence for the claim -- supporting evidence that did not meet the White House's standards for sticking with the claim? This Wikipedia entry on the tantalisingly incomplete Butler Review summarises the current state of knowledge on this confusing issue.

UPDATE: For once, we agree with Mark Steyn. See the middle of his post.

No comments: