David Brooks writing in the New York Times contemplates a future where technology causes huge income disparities --
Economizers. The bottom 85 percent is likely to be made up of people with less marketable workplace skills. Some of these people may struggle financially but not socially or intellectually. That is, they may not make much running a food truck, but they can lead rich lives, using the free bounty of the Internet. They could use a class of advisers on how to preserve rich lives on a small income.
Serious question: is this a vision informed by actual analysis or simply an extrapolation of dystopian sci-fi films that he's seen?
Economizers. The bottom 85 percent is likely to be made up of people with less marketable workplace skills. Some of these people may struggle financially but not socially or intellectually. That is, they may not make much running a food truck, but they can lead rich lives, using the free bounty of the Internet. They could use a class of advisers on how to preserve rich lives on a small income.
Serious question: is this a vision informed by actual analysis or simply an extrapolation of dystopian sci-fi films that he's seen?